Hi,
Broadleaf commerce is great, but I think the documentation could be better.
Because an online documentation is very difficult to maintain I think there are things to do to improve the Javadoc first (this improvement task could be performed progressively...) .
I'm currently working with broadleaf but I lost a lot of time because many functions have not been documentation (so I have to look at the source code each time to know what each function really do).
Each function defined on interfaces should be documented.
Using checkstyle to check missing Javadoc can be a beginning to check classes and functions which do no have been documented.
Is the configuration of checkstyle in Eclipse / Maven broadleaf projects planned in the road map ? Do you think it's a good idea ?
Thanks,
Baptiste
This forum is in readonly mode and serves as an archive of old information. All posting, registration and commenting abilities have been turned off. To get help, the Broadleaf team reguarly monitors the broadleaf-commerce tag on Stack Overflow so please ask your questions there.